Imagine you manage a small business in a part of town that’s
sees more than its share of crime and a wealthy guy from another part of town
walks in trailing a couple big guys that look like bodyguards. Imagine further
that you’re having a conversation with the wealthy guy about the local business
climate, fair treatment of employees, and other topics when he changes the
subject and asks very nicely to dig back in your records and find evidence that
a mutual acquaintance has been involved with something shady. Then he says “You’ve
got a great business here, it would be a shame if something happened to it”.
Would you think he’s a mobster? If he’d asked for cash you’d probably call it a
protection racket.
Donald Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, have
both admitted to having had that conversation with Volodymyr Zelensky, the
President of Ukraine. They’ve both admitted to withholding congressionally
authorized military aid, specifically weapons, from Ukraine in order to extract
the promise of help finding dirt on Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Were Russia
not continuing its illegal and undeclared war on Ukraine it would be easy for
Zelensky to shrug off such demands but support from the United States is
critical to maintaining the freedom, autonomy, democracy of Ukraine. Zelensky
needs all the help he can get to respond to Russian aggression.
The fact that Trump has admitted to extortion for political
gain both in his own statements and in the purported “transcripts” suggests to
me that the whistleblower report is likely even more damning. Trump and his
cronies have been illegally withholding the whistleblower report for nearly a
month then he suddenly admits and can’t stop talking about just what the rumors
have been suggesting. Based on Trump’s past use of outrageous statements to
distract from more important issues I think these revelations likely mean that the
report will document even worse transgressions than the early rumors suggested.
Based on his actions toward Ukraine it would appear Trump actually believes
that his statement from late July, "Then
I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as president,
“ is true.
Article II of the U.S. constitution says nothing of the
sort. In fact Article II clearly limits presidential power, it assigns the
title Commander in Chief of the armed forces, the power to make treaties,
appoint ambassadors, judges, department heads and others but only with
agreement of two thirds of the senate. Article II doesn’t even include the
power to veto legislation but it does provide that the President “shall be
removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or
other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Our congressman, Vicente Gonzalez, finally got on board with
calling for an impeachment inquiry just hours before Speaker Nancy Pelosi
announced that the House would begin such an investigation. The House
leadership has withheld support for impeachment for many months and many
committee investigations have been stymied by witnesses who refused to
cooperate, now that Speaker Pelosi has taken off the brakes we may see quite a
bit of action from the six committees assigned to the investigation in the
coming months. None of it will matter if their chairs don’t hold witnesses in
contempt if they refuse to truthfully and completely answer questions and
provide requested evidentiary documents.
Now is not the time to let up on our member of congress, it
is every bit as imperative now as it was last week to push him to support a
full inquiry into Trump’s misdeeds.
Published in the Seguin Gazette - September 27, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment