Next week is the Winter Solstice, the longest night of the year, unfortunately I’m feeling a truly long night lasting many years in terms of our government and political trends. Last week the radical right majority of the Supreme Court of the United States showed signs of once again reversing long held precedent to satisfy the demands of the most vocal Republican activists without regard to the consequences. This time the Court heard arguments in the case of Carson v. Makin; the question to be decided is whether the state of Maine is required to subsidize religious education. Based on the questions asked or not asked by the Republican appointed justices the consensus among Court watchers is that they’ll render a decision in favor of your tax dollars being funneled to religious schools.
While some readers may not see a problem with that as they
send their children to religious schools and would like the extra funding or
the lower tuition that might be available there are sound constitutional
reasons for not changing the current state of affairs. The first amendment
specifically states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion” which given that later amendments made it clear that
the constitution applies to state and local laws in addition to those passed by
congress means that neither the state of Texas nor a county can favor a
particular religion over another. Government funding religious activities or
organizations has generally been viewed as a step toward establishing a state
religion. Funding religious educational institutions with tax dollars comes
under that heading.
Should the Supreme Court, as seems likely, decide that it’s
fine for government to subsidize religious education realize that it can’t
apply to just Christian schools. This is a case of “be careful what you wish
for as you might get it”. Expect schools associated with any and all religions
to demand their fair share, so look to Islamic schools asking for and getting
the same subsidies. Don’t be surprised if a militant atheist group starts up a
school and rightfully demands the same subsidies as well. Those on the radical
right will first be stunned, then scream bloody murder that they never meant to
subsidize everyone’s religious schools, just their own. I don’t mind eating
popcorn while watching Republican heads explode but I’d much prefer that we
continue the understanding that Constitution requires neutrality, as the Court
held in Everson v. Board of Education (1947), “no tax in any amount, large or
small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions,
whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or
practice religion.”
The doctrine of “Separation of Church and State” has served
this nation well for nearly 250 years and is central to our freedom. Our
founders were well familiar with the consequences of religious wars such as Thirty
Years' War (1618-1648), which devastated Germany and killed one third of its
population. In our lifetimes we’ve seen sectarian violence in both southeastern
Europe and the Middle East. Continuing to chip away at that separation as
Republicans have for decades will harm us all by adding more friction to the
already polarized political situation we now find ourselves in.
Published in the Seguin Gazette - December 15, 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment