It’s not unusual for people to get upset when a District
Attorney declines to prosecute someone that many, often including the
prosecutor and police, believe is guilty. It’s frustrating and we often want to
blame the system. That’s a mistake, we as a nation set a high bar for a guilty
verdict and prosecutors don’t often want to waste their limited resources
trying a case when they don’t believe they can prove guilt beyond a reasonable
doubt. Declining to prosecute is not exoneration; it is an admission that they
have been unable to find sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict. Often
that simply means the guilty party has done a good job hiding the evidence or
that there is no fingerprint or DNA left at the scene of the crime that
provides conclusive proof.
In the case of Trump or a member of his family or campaign
leadership possibly conspiring the Russians to influence the 2016 election
there’s plenty of suspicious activity but without someone on the inside
confessing or providing documentation there is no way to know for sure and
certainly no way to prove such a conspiracy in court.
On the topic of Obstruction of Justice Attorney General
William Barr’s letter to congress specifically says: “The Special Counsel
states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a
crime, it also does not exonerate him.’" This is another case of
suspicious activity but not enough concrete evidence to prove guilt. Remember
Eliot Ness never proved Al Capone was a gangster or bootlegger or that he’d
committed numerous murders. Ness’ teammate Frank Wilson of the Treasury
Department proved tax evasion which is why Capone finally went to jail.
There are still half a dozen prosecutions and investigations
going on in the US Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York which
specializes in financial crimes and where Donald Trump’s former fixer Michael
Cohen is cooperating. Some of the investigations that may lead to prosecuting
Donald Trump include a pair of campaign-finance violations for hush payments that
Cohen says he made to two women at Trump's direction shortly before the 2016
election to keep them from talking about alleged affairs with the
then-presidential candidate, as well as the financial irregularities of the
Trump Organization and Trump's inaugural committee.
Based on Michael Cohen’s public testimony before congress we
already know that Trump overstated the value of various assets in order to get a
loan, that’s bank fraud – a felony. He also understated the value of assets
when reporting his taxable income, that’s tax evasion – another felony. In fact
those two crimes are some of what Paul Manafort and his partner Rick Gates
pleaded guilty to have gone to prison for.
It’s been reported that there are as many other
investigations ongoing into Trump, the Trump Organization and the Trump
campaign in other venues as there are in the Southern District of New York.
Then there are the various House committees looking into Trump’s taxes and
various other activities, so Mueller handing in his final report isn’t the end,
it’s just the end of the beginning.
Published in the Seguin Gazette - March 29. 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment