Late
last week the Bundy brothers and five of their anarchist brethren were found
not guilty of conspiracy in their armed occupation of the Malheur Wildlife
Refuge in Oregon
last year. We may never fully understand how such a crime can go unpunished
since there was live television coverage of who was involved and what was done.
Federal prosecutors are at a loss to explain it but I suspect that the charge
of conspiracy to prevent federal employees from doing their jobs was the
problem.
The
trial lasted for six weeks that alone tells me that the prosecution got deep
into technical issues of the charges given that no one disputed that the men
were there so there was no effort to break alibis or use forensics to prove
their presence. It would seem the jury viewed the term conspiracy very
concretely and since the Bundy gang didn’t verbally discuss preventing wildlife
refuge staff from entering their offices there was no conspiracy.
One
of the Bundy gang testified that they organized some friends and supporters telling
them we’re going to take over the wildlife refuge for awhile until the feds
give up and turn it over to the state of Oregon to manage and we’re going bring
our guns so they don’t arrest us right away. How would you as an employee react
if you found dozens of armed yahoos at your work place and they stopped you and
demanded you identify yourself and checked you for weapons? Are you going to
just continue on to your desk and start work? I don’t think so.
Not
only were they found not guilty of conspiracy; the judge instructed the jury
that without conspiracy they couldn’t find the gang members guilty of weapons
charges either. How do you think a bunch of armed Latinos would be treated here
in Texas if they decided to take over the Alamo and chased out the park rangers? Those folks would
be lucky to walk out alive, let alone walk out of a courtroom as free men.
The
saddest part of this farce is that while the trial was going on hundreds of
unarmed protesters in North Dakota
were being arrested by police in military body armor carrying automatic
weapons. The peaceful protesters supporting the Standing Rock Sioux weren’t
violating federal laws or attempting to take over a federal facility. The
protesters are there to prevent the builders of the Dakota Access Pipeline from
destroying sacred burial sites, prayer sites and culturally significant
artifacts. Just as important to the members of the Standing Rock Sioux they are
trying to prevent contamination of the Missouri River
which is the only source of safe water in the area.
The
Sioux have an 1851 treaty supporting their claims while the Bundy’s had
nothing. It remains to be seen how the protest will be resolved and how the
arrests will be adjudicated but if there is any justice in this world it will
turn out even better for the Standing Rock Sioux than what the Bundy’s got away
with.
Published in the Seguin Gazette November 4, 2016
Published in the Seguin Gazette November 4, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment